There is good reason for scholars to debate about the identity of Melchizedek, the way that the writer describes him gives the reader an impression that he is somewhat of an otherworldly fellow and there is a lot said in Hebrews 7 that we have to wrestle with. In my estimation, Melchizedek was a very righteous and peaceful man and perhaps an image of Christ, but not the pre-incarnate Christ as some have deduced. His very name meant “king of peace” and “king of righteousness.”
In Hebrews 7:1 it says that he was the king of Salem, priest of the Most High God. Salem was another name for ancient Jerusalem, which I find interesting because Jesus will be the King and High priest of Jerusalem in the age to come. When Abraham encountered him in the valley of Shaveh (located just outside of Jerusalem) in Genesis 14, Melchizedek offered him bread and wine. I believe he encountered Abraham here as a foreshadowing of Christ. Bread and wine were the common food for royals in that day, it was also the food often enjoyed in a covenant making meal. These aspects of Melchizedek’s life serve as a foreshadowing of Jesus who was yet to come!
Hebrews 7:3 goes on to say that he was “without father, without mother, without genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life, but made like the Son of God, remains a priest continually.” Without parents and genealogy doesn’t have to mean that he appeared on the earth without a mother or a father, he could have been orphaned, and left without a traceable lineage(complete speculation here). Psalm 68:5 says that God is a father to the fatherless. An important word to note in verse three is the word “like”, Melchizedek was made “like” the Son of God, not made “the” Son of God. According to Strong’s Concordance, the Hebrew word for “like”, ἀφομοιόω, is defined, “to cause a model to pass off into an image or shape like it, to express itself in it, to copy, or to be made like, render similar.”
If Jesus is high priest in the order of Melchizedek as the writer of Hebrews has already established and Melchizedek was simply a priest of the Most High God, Jesus is clearly placed in a role above him, therefore it is unlikely they are the same person.
Melchizedek was renowned as a very righteous man and was very dear to the heart of God. My guess is that he ministered before the Lord’s heart in a very intimate way as God had intended for humanity before the fall, like Enoch did in Genesis 5, and he lived a priestly role in Jerusalem before the Levitical priesthood was even a sparkle in Israel’s eye. Therefore, he was chosen by God according to the criteria that we have discussed from chapter 5 of Hebrews as a high priest in the order of Melchizedek.
If I were to speculate on who he is and where he is right now, I would say that he was a human, named Melchizedek, king of Salem, called a priest because he ministered to the heart of the Lord (even before the temple was established), so radically faithful and holy in the way he served the Lord in his life that the Lord took him up and he is a priest in the heavenly temple as we speak. I would even venture to guess that he is one of the 24 elders seated around the throne. That is how I would conclude the fact that he had no end of days… But, we have nothing to my knowledge that has been written in the bible or in history about that so I will keep this as my personal conviction and not something that I would teach as truth. 🙂